BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:52 pm

[url=http://www.cwtv.com/images/topmodel/antm_cycle13_eligibility.pdf ]http://www.cwtv.com/images/topmodel/antm_cycle13_eligibility.pdf [/url]

Look at Number 8....


Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Guest on Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:55 pm

I was just about to post this. That is so FUCKING ridiculous.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:56 pm

I hope it isn't true.... Mad Mad Mad...it can't be true.
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  younevergofullretard on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:08 pm

what was the height requirement until now?

younevergofullretard

Number of posts : 414
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Hottamaletrain on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:08 pm

I think it was much higher before, wasn't sara like 6 foot tall?
Hottamaletrain
Hottamaletrain

Number of posts : 976
Location : Montclair, NJ
Registration date : 2009-01-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:09 pm

5'7 or taller
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Ava on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:11 pm

Wait what? You have to be smaller than 5'7?
Ava
Ava

Number of posts : 106
Registration date : 2008-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:12 pm

Yes....5'7 or under...which is already too short to model....so a dwarf can audition...

Real models are 5'9 to 5'11...
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  younevergofullretard on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:12 pm

omg i'm so retarded i guess i didn't see this coming. i thought it said 5'7 or taller and that they will make exceptions but WTF MATE AT OR UNDER 5'7???? that's just fucked up. i'm not going to watch cycle 13.

younevergofullretard

Number of posts : 414
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Hottamaletrain on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:13 pm

That's so strange. They should have just started from the shortest they were expecting up. like " 5'5 or taller"
Hottamaletrain
Hottamaletrain

Number of posts : 976
Location : Montclair, NJ
Registration date : 2009-01-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Karasu on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:13 pm

so wait a minute, cycle 13 will be with girls under 5'7"????
Karasu
Karasu

Number of posts : 936
Location : Staten Island, New York
Registration date : 2008-12-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:14 pm

Yes...stupid. If they want a short girl to win...pick one...but don't deny a bunch of girls with real potential.
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Hottamaletrain on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:17 pm

Maybe producers will make exceptions for taller girls? If not, that's really stupid. What kind of market are they trying to target with a short model?
Hottamaletrain
Hottamaletrain

Number of posts : 976
Location : Montclair, NJ
Registration date : 2009-01-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:18 pm

ALL short models...they need to make exceptions for short girls not tall ones...This is stupid. I rather have all plus size models...or all burns victims than all short girls.
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:19 pm

What about all black or all asian...something....but not all short.
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Hottamaletrain on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:26 pm

Maybe they're trying to put together a new sob story, like "I've always been told I'm too short to model, and I'm hear to break the mold!" Rolling Eyes
Hottamaletrain
Hottamaletrain

Number of posts : 976
Location : Montclair, NJ
Registration date : 2009-01-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:28 pm

Yeah....but there is no mold to break if they ALL are short...they are stupid if they think that. Jaslene and Eva already took care of that.
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Guest on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:30 pm

Yeah you know what I'm not watching Cycle 13 if that's the case.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:31 pm

I'm not going to lie...I will...you know it's one of those things that if they do it for one cycle...they won't do it again.
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Hottamaletrain on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:34 pm

What happened to ANTM. Saliesha and Whitney didn't deserve to win, then they got back on track and at least McKey won.... now they're going back to picking mediocre models. wtf....
Hottamaletrain
Hottamaletrain

Number of posts : 976
Location : Montclair, NJ
Registration date : 2009-01-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Jilpen on Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:34 pm

Well, they still have Cycle 12...
Jilpen
Jilpen

Number of posts : 825
Location : LA and Chicago
Registration date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13... Empty Re: BIG Requirement Change for Cycle 13...

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum